Skip to main content

Anything but the Office

By
iep2 has been involved in many meetings where building or replacing administration spaces is on the table. This is when the controversy begins.  Many people are concerned, rightly so, about facility bond money going to “space for the student”, not non-student space, such as the administration office.  Don’t get us wrong we are all about improving student environments and understand that they are why we have schools in the first place, BUT just for a moment we ask you to consider something that often gets over looked.

Typical high priority list items in school planning are:

  • Safety
  • Welcoming Environments (AKA don’t make it look like a prison)
  • Community / Parent Involvement
  • Collaboration
  • Creating  a Campus Identity

Now let’s consider what the offices designed at most 1940’s-1960’s schools have to deal with:
  • No walk through access (which does not allow visitors to walk in one door pass through an office space and walk out inside the schools “safe perimeter”)
  • Limited visibility to the school grounds and the entry ways onto campus
  • Building located too close to the street edge which compromises proper drop-off and pick-up areas for the current driving population
  • Tiny lobby spaces and small broken up rooms
  • No room for counseling, child services, Safety Officers, phycologist or other services that may come to support students and families
  • No conference rooms or parent meeting areas
  • At the high school level, separate buildings for counseling, attendance and health offices from the main administration (which are hard to navigate for parents, less secure and inefficient)
  • Limited staff space designed for when the teaching staff was half the size and collaboration was not the focus of professional development 
  • Limited architectural interest or prominence as the campus’ front door

Working on an existing site and trying to bring it up to the 21st century can be difficult, especially when the original site layout was for fewer students and when there were fewer cars and having multiple entrance points was OK.  Expanding the school capacity and creating a “proper font door”, central to the campus with a secure entrance and vehicle and pedestrian ways, typically requires a reorientation of the campus and this usually leads to the controversial discussion of a new administration office. 


So, before writing off administration as non-important because it is non-student space, please think about the role the “front door” and porches play in your house. Consider the functions within an office; they support families, communities and student health. And most importantly, school safety and security, which should always be considered at the top of our improvement list!
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changing an Icon

By
Changing an Icon I draw. Little doddles cover cards and note pads at large and small gatherings. It was a note taking technique I was taught and gratefully adopted early in my career. The reason, beyond my lack of spelling talent, is really to distill the spoken word into the most basic pictorial concept because when gathering information from so many, it needs to be contained and expressed in the most condensed form. The smallness allows all input to be displayed at once. Most of the drawings are well accepted icons to today’s texters, our culture’s emogies. These symbols hold strong association. A “house” is often drawn with gable roof and two symmetrical windows on either side of the door in the middle. We faithfully hold that image in our head even though very few, if any, have ever lived in a house that looks like the icon. We have many of these connections imprinted on our brains. Think of trains, building types, flowers and genders, which all have the easy mental imag...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expecting the Worst

By
I recently listened to “ This American Life ” radio episode on expectations.  The episode focused on the visually impaired and how societies’ expectation of what they can do is holding them back from what is really possible and it got me thinking how are our expectations of students holding us back from designing and implementing schools? I remember a programing meeting in particular, which one of the more common debates of classroom design was debated: visual connection.  I have always been fascinated by how this discussion goes because our standard structure for programming goes as follows: Meeting 1: Discuss overarching goals of the facility Meeting 2: Define in general each space needed and the size and quantity of those spaces Meeting 3: Prioritized the spaces to fit budget and arrange the “pieces” functionally to meet the adjacency needs of the facility Meeting 4:Define the specifics of each space such as the cabinetry, need for sinks, accessories and amen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why is it designed that way?

By
Why is it designed that way?  It can be a common question when touring facilities on assessment or in a recent case during an interview. Still I wonder why more people do not ask that question on a day to day basis.  I do.  It is common fascination when touring facilities.  Looking a strange cabinetry and realizing the room was originally for a sewing class or once in Mexico, showing a whole group of guys that you need to pull a pin out to release the spare tire from under our stuck vehicle.  Designers normally do not place things willy nilly yet understanding the function of a design can be elusive.  No matter the effort in programing and design, new users are always present for when the building opens, who don’t know why decisions were made on the placement of switches and amenities or arrangement of spaces.  On the operational side, including servicing heating and air conditioning and cleaning finishes, there are manuals that are created, but,...
Post a Comment
Read more