Skip to main content

Define: Facility Needs

By
Getting bogged down by the jargon on 21st century learning? You are not the only one.  One of my first tasks in starting a relationship with a District is discovering the District’s terminology for departments and special programs.  Special education is always an area where terms like Special Day Class can mean a whole host of different things and require different type of spaces.  Different approaches to learning and the world of technology have exploded the learning vocabulary to the point there needs to be a dictionary.  A Dictionary For 21st Century Teachers: Learning Models & Technology

Creating common language is key to making any organization work.  One of the unsung heroes of a facilities master plan is the cross pollination of jargon, philosophy and purpose different departments have in an organization and how they affect the final environment.  

Teachers will ask why they can’t paint their classroom a different color and the maintenance department will demand a reduction of paint colors in a construction project order to limit the amount they must keep in stock.  While this paint example is a simple one, I am always amazed during a master plan what opportunities are missed by not having connections between departments and the frustration that is resolved by having a meeting together.  Visioning and creating standards are two wonderful times to have those conversions.  Where representatives across disciplines can come together and work out an approach, which, in the end, serves the ultimate goal of the organization as a whole.  In education, that ultimate goal is as Tim always says “is all about the kids!”

How is your department's needs/objectives misinterpreted by other parts of the organization?  Do you have a success story of bringing different departments together to solve a facilities issue?
Labels:

Comments

  1. UnknownFebruary 17, 2015 at 11:10 AM

    Ellen's point in this BLOG is one of the key drivers in creating a successful master plan for not only our educational clients, but as well our other clients who want effective, efficient, productive work environments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownFebruary 17, 2015 at 4:47 PM

    One other communication tool for the generational divide.
    http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/finding_common_ground/2015/02/how_to_be_more_generationally_savvy_part_1.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownFebruary 19, 2015 at 8:50 PM

    Ellen I really enjoyed your blog. Simple and to the point. I hope school project managers and staff get to see this and follow your advice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changing an Icon

By
Changing an Icon I draw. Little doddles cover cards and note pads at large and small gatherings. It was a note taking technique I was taught and gratefully adopted early in my career. The reason, beyond my lack of spelling talent, is really to distill the spoken word into the most basic pictorial concept because when gathering information from so many, it needs to be contained and expressed in the most condensed form. The smallness allows all input to be displayed at once. Most of the drawings are well accepted icons to today’s texters, our culture’s emogies. These symbols hold strong association. A “house” is often drawn with gable roof and two symmetrical windows on either side of the door in the middle. We faithfully hold that image in our head even though very few, if any, have ever lived in a house that looks like the icon. We have many of these connections imprinted on our brains. Think of trains, building types, flowers and genders, which all have the easy mental imag...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expecting the Worst

By
I recently listened to “ This American Life ” radio episode on expectations.  The episode focused on the visually impaired and how societies’ expectation of what they can do is holding them back from what is really possible and it got me thinking how are our expectations of students holding us back from designing and implementing schools? I remember a programing meeting in particular, which one of the more common debates of classroom design was debated: visual connection.  I have always been fascinated by how this discussion goes because our standard structure for programming goes as follows: Meeting 1: Discuss overarching goals of the facility Meeting 2: Define in general each space needed and the size and quantity of those spaces Meeting 3: Prioritized the spaces to fit budget and arrange the “pieces” functionally to meet the adjacency needs of the facility Meeting 4:Define the specifics of each space such as the cabinetry, need for sinks, accessories and amen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why is it designed that way?

By
Why is it designed that way?  It can be a common question when touring facilities on assessment or in a recent case during an interview. Still I wonder why more people do not ask that question on a day to day basis.  I do.  It is common fascination when touring facilities.  Looking a strange cabinetry and realizing the room was originally for a sewing class or once in Mexico, showing a whole group of guys that you need to pull a pin out to release the spare tire from under our stuck vehicle.  Designers normally do not place things willy nilly yet understanding the function of a design can be elusive.  No matter the effort in programing and design, new users are always present for when the building opens, who don’t know why decisions were made on the placement of switches and amenities or arrangement of spaces.  On the operational side, including servicing heating and air conditioning and cleaning finishes, there are manuals that are created, but,...
Post a Comment
Read more