Skip to main content

Is Beauty Worth the Cost?

By
Throughout the ages institutional buildings have been designed to exhibit different messages that "the state" wanted to project.  Power, strength and wealth were common with monarchies. After all it was important to show the monarchs importance and ability to construct something monumental. In a democratic republic, we have chosen a variety of images.  In the early days strength and stability were important but these have given way, in some cases, to utility and efficiency.  Part of this shift is the limited amount of funds available and the higher cost of labor.  Still, there have been several meeting where the "perception of extravagance" has been a concern. It has been said that, "To show we are good stewards of tax payer money, we can't have anything that looks that extravagant." As a slave to function instead of fashion, I have often nodded along, pushing for extra square footage versus architectural fussiness.

Of course no one wants a building project to be "ugly," but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  I worked with one inspiring architect that always mentioned that beauty does not need to cost more.  I also worked with a contractor who in pre-construction design review meetings mentioned that every new corner on a building cost more.  In a design class at San Jose State, the professor talked about Tower Hall and while the design looks extravagant in a combination of historic revival styles, the brick detailing is very limited and really, it is just a concrete building. The truth of the cost of beauty is as allusive as beauty itself, but is it something that school buildings should strive for?
San Jose State Tower Hall

I was recently listening to the TED Radio Hour where "beauty" was the theme of the week.  One of the highlighted speakers talked about the importance of beauty in school design and affect it has on behavior.  I have heard other research on well kept buildings producing less problems then ones left messy.  An area that is has graffiti will more likely be a target for more graffiti. Any fan of Blue Bloods knows the broken window concept of a place with one broken window will soon have many and from there it is downward spiral.

So the next time you drive by a beautiful school will you see it as a beacon of a community that supports education or a Taj Mahal?  Should we be concerned with beauty in schools?  Should we assume that beauty cost more?  There are a lot of grey between the yes and no answers in these questions, but as in most things in life, I hope we find the happy medium.  Schools should be inspiring and clean but there is a line that stretches beyond reason. Still, somethings that look extravagant may not cost as much as you think.

Would you like another perspective.... Interestingly enough after this post was put up I ran into another publication running a story on "Building Beauty" in the California Educator check out page 26.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changing an Icon

By
Changing an Icon I draw. Little doddles cover cards and note pads at large and small gatherings. It was a note taking technique I was taught and gratefully adopted early in my career. The reason, beyond my lack of spelling talent, is really to distill the spoken word into the most basic pictorial concept because when gathering information from so many, it needs to be contained and expressed in the most condensed form. The smallness allows all input to be displayed at once. Most of the drawings are well accepted icons to today’s texters, our culture’s emogies. These symbols hold strong association. A “house” is often drawn with gable roof and two symmetrical windows on either side of the door in the middle. We faithfully hold that image in our head even though very few, if any, have ever lived in a house that looks like the icon. We have many of these connections imprinted on our brains. Think of trains, building types, flowers and genders, which all have the easy mental imag...
Post a Comment
Read more

Expecting the Worst

By
I recently listened to “ This American Life ” radio episode on expectations.  The episode focused on the visually impaired and how societies’ expectation of what they can do is holding them back from what is really possible and it got me thinking how are our expectations of students holding us back from designing and implementing schools? I remember a programing meeting in particular, which one of the more common debates of classroom design was debated: visual connection.  I have always been fascinated by how this discussion goes because our standard structure for programming goes as follows: Meeting 1: Discuss overarching goals of the facility Meeting 2: Define in general each space needed and the size and quantity of those spaces Meeting 3: Prioritized the spaces to fit budget and arrange the “pieces” functionally to meet the adjacency needs of the facility Meeting 4:Define the specifics of each space such as the cabinetry, need for sinks, accessories and amen...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why is it designed that way?

By
Why is it designed that way?  It can be a common question when touring facilities on assessment or in a recent case during an interview. Still I wonder why more people do not ask that question on a day to day basis.  I do.  It is common fascination when touring facilities.  Looking a strange cabinetry and realizing the room was originally for a sewing class or once in Mexico, showing a whole group of guys that you need to pull a pin out to release the spare tire from under our stuck vehicle.  Designers normally do not place things willy nilly yet understanding the function of a design can be elusive.  No matter the effort in programing and design, new users are always present for when the building opens, who don’t know why decisions were made on the placement of switches and amenities or arrangement of spaces.  On the operational side, including servicing heating and air conditioning and cleaning finishes, there are manuals that are created, but,...
Post a Comment
Read more