Skip to main content

Is Beauty Worth the Cost?

By
Throughout the ages institutional buildings have been designed to exhibit different messages that "the state" wanted to project.  Power, strength and wealth were common with monarchies. After all it was important to show the monarchs importance and ability to construct something monumental. In a democratic republic, we have chosen a variety of images.  In the early days strength and stability were important but these have given way, in some cases, to utility and efficiency.  Part of this shift is the limited amount of funds available and the higher cost of labor.  Still, there have been several meeting where the "perception of extravagance" has been a concern. It has been said that, "To show we are good stewards of tax payer money, we can't have anything that looks that extravagant." As a slave to function instead of fashion, I have often nodded along, pushing for extra square footage versus architectural fussiness.

Of course no one wants a building project to be "ugly," but beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  I worked with one inspiring architect that always mentioned that beauty does not need to cost more.  I also worked with a contractor who in pre-construction design review meetings mentioned that every new corner on a building cost more.  In a design class at San Jose State, the professor talked about Tower Hall and while the design looks extravagant in a combination of historic revival styles, the brick detailing is very limited and really, it is just a concrete building. The truth of the cost of beauty is as allusive as beauty itself, but is it something that school buildings should strive for?
San Jose State Tower Hall

I was recently listening to the TED Radio Hour where "beauty" was the theme of the week.  One of the highlighted speakers talked about the importance of beauty in school design and affect it has on behavior.  I have heard other research on well kept buildings producing less problems then ones left messy.  An area that is has graffiti will more likely be a target for more graffiti. Any fan of Blue Bloods knows the broken window concept of a place with one broken window will soon have many and from there it is downward spiral.

So the next time you drive by a beautiful school will you see it as a beacon of a community that supports education or a Taj Mahal?  Should we be concerned with beauty in schools?  Should we assume that beauty cost more?  There are a lot of grey between the yes and no answers in these questions, but as in most things in life, I hope we find the happy medium.  Schools should be inspiring and clean but there is a line that stretches beyond reason. Still, somethings that look extravagant may not cost as much as you think.

Would you like another perspective.... Interestingly enough after this post was put up I ran into another publication running a story on "Building Beauty" in the California Educator check out page 26.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Changing an Icon

By
Changing an Icon I draw. Little doddles cover cards and note pads at large and small gatherings. It was a note taking technique I was taught and gratefully adopted early in my career. The reason, beyond my lack of spelling talent, is really to distill the spoken word into the most basic pictorial concept because when gathering information from so many, it needs to be contained and expressed in the most condensed form. The smallness allows all input to be displayed at once. Most of the drawings are well accepted icons to today’s texters, our culture’s emogies. These symbols hold strong association. A “house” is often drawn with gable roof and two symmetrical windows on either side of the door in the middle. We faithfully hold that image in our head even though very few, if any, have ever lived in a house that looks like the icon. We have many of these connections imprinted on our brains. Think of trains, building types, flowers and genders, which all have the easy mental imag...
Post a Comment
Read more

Now you see me, now you don't...

By
A question that has confounded us for some time is the quiet war against windows.  A mound of research is piling up on the benefits of natural light and views to the outside.  It can improve moods, shorten healing time, reduce eye strain and help students focus.  If you are interviewing users in a building that currently does not have windows, it is one of the most passionate requests, "just give me a window and I will be happy." CHPS , the Collaborative for High Performance Schools, has both access to daylight and views as possible points in the Indoor Environmental Quality section. So why when we tour and assess schools are windows most often covered?  We go around the state, for that matter the region, and see this covering time and time again. High windows, low windows, north facing, south facing, interior, exterior... you name it, someone has covered them. In the attempts to understand this dichotomy of those who have windows, cover them and t...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did we get here?

By
Our blogs are often inspired by questions we are asked.  When conducting community meetings, this questioning is just a daily part of the job. Some questions are popular, like this one, "How did we get here?" and going unstated is "with so many schools that need so much work?" This is a very common question, especially in California. The question refers to the current state of the school facilities.  Normally, this is followed by our school facilities are unacceptable, deplorable, inadequate, unsafe and out of date.  We have heard these descriptors from so many community members, administrators and teachers in every district that we conduct meetings.  Can we answer this question? As in every problem that has taken our society decades to create, a complex system of circumstances and hard choices lead to our run down, out of date and generally uninspiring school facilities. Although every school district has unique factors that contribute to the condi...
Post a Comment
Read more